The upcoming Canadian Security Showcase in Ottawa, organized by Public Sector Network, has sparked conversations about the inclusivity of such events by some of our members. Exclusively open to public sector attendees, with private sector participants only allowed as paying sponsors, the event raises important questions about collaboration and knowledge sharing in the security space.
If solving cybersecurity is all about collaboration, does it really move the yardsticks to exclude a large part of the community? While the focus on the public sector is understandable—given that governments face unique challenges such as protecting critical infrastructure, managing enormous data stores, and safeguarding health and privacy—the many reported (and unreported) breaches clearly illustrate the growing risks. It's great to spotlight public sector priorities, but should this come at the expense of diverse perspectives that could lead to more comprehensive solutions? Maybe it's a question of security clearances? Although, insider threats have proven to be the biggest challenge and external sponsors are allowed, so what gives? Thoughts.
This also raises an intriguing question: if the private sector were to adopt a similar approach with their larger conferences, how would public sector employees feel about being excluded? Would such a model foster progress, or would it create a divide in an industry where collaboration is vital? Just curious to hear what people think—does this approach help or hinder the greater cybersecurity mission or is it all good?